Business: Governance, Strategy and Analysis

People walking down the bridge towards Konan at Shinagawa Station in Tokyo

Organisations rarely fail where their rules say they will. They fail in the space between what is written and what is done: where decisions drift away from the people accountable for them, where a partnership quietly holds more of a company's value than the company does, and where a culture enforces a rule that no policy ever stated. These articles work in that space.

They fall into three groups. The Organisational Gaps series examines governance: each article names a structural gap and offers a diagnostic for boards, risk committees and governance professionals. The strategy and business cases take the same eye to commercial decisions, drawing mostly on Asian companies whose stories are under-told in English. The working across cultures pieces look at how organisations actually behave in the markets where the rules are unwritten.

Organisational Gaps

An ongoing series on how governance fails quietly. Each piece identifies a structural gap and provides a diagnostic for recognising it in your own organisation.

The governance series has its own index, which carries the full set with the diagnostics attached: Organisational Gaps →

It examines where decisions migrate away from the people accountable for them, where governance structures signal assurance they cannot provide, and where silence becomes the dominant mode of institutional choice.

Strategy and business cases

Commercial decisions examined with the same eye. Most of the cases are Asian companies whose stories are rarely told in English, which is part of the point.

Working across cultures

How organisations actually behave where the rules are unwritten. Governance, escalation and decision-making as they are practised, not as they are documented.

What's next

Upcoming articles.

  • What the exit plan doesn't cover – the strategy literature has understood for decades that value in a partnership can be captured by the other side at exit. The governance frameworks built to manage third-party risk have not caught up.
  • The structural gap between expertise and decision-making – why the people who know most often decide least.
  • Perceived assurance versus actual assurance in risk oversight – the distance between what a committee believes it provides and what it structurally can.

Related

  • The Toyota Production System – governance of a different kind: how Toyota embeds operational discipline through structure rather than oversight.
  • Hong Kong Commercial History – the full archive behind the KPS and Maria's Bakery cases: biographies, primary sources, and street-level memories of the brands and institutions that defined post-war Hong Kong.
  • Working Across Cultures – the practical companion to the culture pieces above: business cards, running international teams, and the expatriate experience.

This is a living index. New articles appear here as they publish. Each is written to stand alone, but together they make a broader argument about how organisations behave when nobody is watching the gap between the rule and the practice.

Comments

All posts loaded No posts found VIEW ALL Read more Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS No posts found Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content